Meta:Administrators/confirm: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Older edit Newer edit →

Content deleted Content added

Visual Wikitext

Inline

Revision as of 06:31, 12 April 2008 edit

VasilievVV (talk | contribs)

1,728 edits

→‎Slade

← Older edit

Revision as of 19:41, 12 April 2008 edit undo

Radon210 (talk | contribs)

18 edits

→‎Majorly: keep

Newer edit →

Line 284: Line 284:

*{{keep}} [[User:Philippe|Philippe]] 14:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

*{{keep}} --[[User:Meno25|Meno25]] 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

*{{keep}} from Wikipedia [[User:Alexfusco5|[[User:Alexfusco5|'''Alex''']][[User talk:Alexfusco5|'''fusco''']][[Special:Contributions/Alexfusco5|'''5''']]]] 19:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

==[[User:Millosh|Millosh]]==

Revision as of 19:41, 12 April 2008

Shortcut:
WM:A/C

This page hosts annual confirmation (or removal) of administrators according to the Administrator policies. Please vote to either keep or remove the following users as admins. If you think any of these administrators should not keep their access, please add Remove below. You don't have to vote keep if there is no remove yet. Admins will keep their access if there are no votes, or more than 75% keeps.

.snoopy.

.snoopy. (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Sr 13 03:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep active and helpful. --Anonymous Dissident ^Talk 14:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Bastique

Bastique (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep, sure — Vasil ievVV 16:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Jacob 19:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep--Ahonc 15:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Yeah, I guess... ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Looks fine. Sr 13 07:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Philippe 14:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Cbrown1023

Cbrown1023 (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep — Vasil ievVV 16:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Jacob 19:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep ----Anonymous Dissident ^Talk 11:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep I know him from EN:WQ; he's a good boy.--Cato 22:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Charitwo 23:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Without a doubt. Very helpful admin. –Ejs-80 01:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Active and helpful. Sr 13 07:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep active. Philippe 14:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Cspurrier

Cspurrier (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Note, cu has already been removed by the user himself.

Remove Remove Inactive since 2007年12月26日. Suggest also removing checkuser tool if it hasn't been used too (I'm not too sure what the policy on the checkuser tool is, but it does get removed after a length of inactivity.) Majorly (talk ) 01:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
I think all rights should be confirmed simultaneously. If the user is active either as an administrator or as a checkuser, they should not be removed for inactivity. Similarly, remove both if they're inactive. —{admin} Pathoschild 02:21:10, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
With the exception of steward, right? What I'm saying is to remove both anyway. Majorly (talk ) 02:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Steward access is not based on Meta election, so it's not subject to Meta confirmation. —{admin} Pathoschild 02:27:37, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Remove - He is very active on Darkoneko ..--Comet styles 05:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove for inactivity, and someone should check the CU logs. I'd say if it's close to a year, remove that too. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 05:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
He performed a series of checks on 13–16 March 2007. According to the logs, he's otherwise never used his checkuser access. —{admin} Pathoschild 17:28:32, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
According to the checkuser policy, it should automatically be removed after a year of inactivity. Pathoschild, would you mind checking the other checkusers here for activity? Thanks, Majorly (talk ) 17:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Okay, will do. —{admin} Pathoschild 17:55:44, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Remove for inactivity - same for checkuser unless surprises. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove Due to inactivity --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove Inactive, but I just left him a message on Wikinews to alert him of this. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Thanks EVula for the note. I intend to be more active on meta in the coming months. Other responsibilities have led me to neglect Meta, but I intend to change that :). I can not really remember why I have checkuser, but since meta has gotten local checkusers I have not used it and it should be removed, as I have done. --Cspurrier 17:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep admin but maybe revisit in 3 months instead of a year? Remove Remove checkuser. ++Lar: t/c 00:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove I'm afraid. --Anonymous Dissident ^Talk 11:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep as an admin: Steward & current inactive clause says "0 edits within 6 months and 50 edits within a year". He doesn't meet that. --Aphaia 12:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove as CU, due to inactivity. --Aphaia 12:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove as both; even if within the letter of the rules he could stay as an admin, he is clearly rather inactive.--Cato 22:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep, user wants to be more active here, --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} ∇ 01:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep I share spacebirdy's opinion. --Jacob 15:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep per Cspurrier. --Thogo (talk) 07:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Inactive, but user is willing to make up for it. Sr 13 07:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove planning to be active is not the same as being so. I'm sure when the user is active again seeking the rights will be fine. (CU will have been granted for "log access" and is no longer valid as there is no cross wiki log) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 06:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Drini

Drini (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
By Majorly's request, I checked how active the checkusers on Meta were. Drini is active. —{admin} Pathoschild 18:00:04, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Keep --Jacob 19:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep--Ahonc 15:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep--LadyInGrey 21:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep--Mardetanha 22:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Sr 13 07:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep active. Philippe 14:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Dungodung

Dungodung (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Jacob 19:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Ahonc 15:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --LadyInGrey 21:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep--Mardetanha 22:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Effeietsanders

Effeietsanders (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Jacob 19:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Mardetanha 22:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Philippe 14:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Fantasy

Fantasy (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Remove Remove Inactive since 2007年11月16日, and appears to have left. Majorly (talk ) 01:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove Inactive and last admin action on May 2007 ..--Comet styles 05:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove inactive, sadly. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove Inactive --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove inactive. Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove He left Wikipedia.--Ahonc 15:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove no he left meta, it isn't same to leave Wikipedia. Due to inactivity and thousand appreciations for all his works done on meta and the community at large! --Aphaia 12:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove --LadyInGrey 21:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove Let's let him go. Sr 13 07:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Hashar

Hashar (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Remove Remove Inactive since 2007年05月05日. Majorly (talk ) 01:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove - Last admin action in 2005, no need for the tools..--Comet styles 05:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove last admin action indeed in 2005. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove Inactive --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove inactive. Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove inactive --Ahonc 15:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Neutral Neutral inactive enough, but he as a sysadmin is around there at least on #wikimedia-tech. I think we are better to let him retain the sysop access as long as he is around, even vaguely. --Aphaia 12:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove --LadyInGrey 21:46, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove Inactive. –Ejs-80 01:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

JamesDay

JamesDay (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Remove Remove Inactive since 2007年08月08日, and no logged actions. Majorly (talk ) 01:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove - Inactive and no-admin action since given the tools ..--Comet styles 05:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove no action in the logs at all. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove No longer active --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove per above. Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove Inactivity. I heard he is also inactive as a sysadmin. --Aphaia 12:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Clarification: Wikitech shows his last activity as 23 August 2007 [1] and he apparently no longer has SVN access [2] [3] since May 2006. No logged actions on Meta [4] at all. Further input from other developers would be appreciated. ~Kylu (u|t) 01:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Jon Harald Søby

Jon Harald Søby (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Ahonc 15:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Helpful.--Cato 22:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Mardetanha 22:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Kate

Kate (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Remove Remove - Kate is vaguely "around" but isn't using the tools. I consider this user inactive as an administrator. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Neutral Neutral Well, Kate is a steward, so the question of his adminship here has no relevance in my eyes. FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- He has recently denied even being a steward... Majorly (talk ) 11:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
  - What do you mean? That he has the steward flag as developer? ('cause that I recall) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
    - I think so. Majorly (talk ) 16:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Neutral Neutral Pretty inactive. Majorly (talk ) 11:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove - well he is a developer and can change his rights via the server and the Steward flag is not an important issue, since he believes he is not a Steward, but he assigned himself as a steward to make his workload bearable..--Comet styles 14:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Neutral Neutral per Dungodung --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Need input from River himself — Vasil ievVV 16:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove inactive. Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep per Dungodung.--Ahonc 15:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove inactive. When he needs the tools, he can easily either ask someone in the IRC channel, or make himself sysop with his steward buttons. --Thogo (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Current inactive clause says "0 edits within 6 months and 50 edits within a year". He doesn't meet that. --Aphaia 11:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove inactive --Charitwo 23:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep active system administrator. Cary Bass ^demandez 23:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep per cary. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 23:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Jacob 15:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep per Cary. Philippe 14:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Kph

Kph (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep - active, helps out a lot with the portals...--Comet styles 05:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep per Comets. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Lar

Lar (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
By Majorly's request, I checked how active the checkusers on Meta were. Lar is active. —{admin} Pathoschild 18:00:55, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep--Ahonc 15:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep (Hug)--Cato 22:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Mardetanha 22:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Charitwo 01:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Philippe 14:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Majorly

Majorly (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Comment Comment: Formal support will be given if willing to understand and agree w:Wikipedia:BITE and w:WP:AGF, as suggested by RfA Candidate's Song.--Jusjih 02:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Would you care to explain what you mean? Thanks, Majorly (talk ) 02:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Mønobi 02:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Controversial, yes. Abused tools, no. Nishkid64 (talk) 03:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep - Majorly is really very active on Meta and I doubt that he will ever abuse the tools..--Comet styles 05:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 is spot-on. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 05:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep, and thanks for the work done in this year — Vasil ievVV 16:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
I am adding my unnecessary Keep Keep to the list. A very hardworking bureaucrat and an asset to the project. ++Lar: t/c 23:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
keep. Without any doubt. --Anonymous Dissident ^Talk 06:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep--Ahonc 15:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Good value.--Cato 22:23, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Mardetanha 22:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove Has maturity issues, behavior on other projects affects my opinion on a global scale. --Charitwo 23:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Mature and hardworking es: Drini 23:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Maturity is not a requirement for Admin. Majorly acts in his role in an exceptional manner. Cary Bass ^demandez 00:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep, hard working on meta, if someone doesn't like him on other wikis, bad for them good for us. --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} ∇ 00:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep With no doubts. · AndonicO ^Talk 02:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep -- Chetblong 02:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Comment Comment as the rule said, this confirmation is not intended to be voting, but rather designed to give the community a chance to raise their concerns around the current sysop each: So I think it isn't inappropriate some people show their concerns, in this case, maturity etc. I hope this issue is settled through productive interactions with interested parties. Aph.
Keep Keep Hardworking, no abuse, no reason to remove the flag. --Aphaia 07:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep No reason why not. --Thogo (talk) 07:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Great contributor. Sr 13 07:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Philippe 14:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep from Wikipedia [[User:Alexfusco5|'''Alex''']][[User talk:Alexfusco5|'''fusco''']][[Special:Contributions/Alexfusco5|'''5''']] 19:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Millosh

Millosh (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep--Ahonc 15:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Mardetanha 22:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Nick1915

Nick1915 (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep--Ahonc 15:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Mardetanha 22:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Nishkid64

Nishkid64 (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Nixeagle

Nixeagle (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Mønobi 02:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep ----Anonymous Dissident ^Talk 21:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Redux

Redux (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep active. Majorly (talk ) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
By Majorly's request, I checked how active the checkusers on Meta were. According to the logs, Redux has never used his checkuser access. —{admin} Pathoschild 18:02:08, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
- In that case, I suggest that while he should be kept as an admin, he should remove his checkuser right. Majorly (talk ) 20:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
  - Was it granted the normal way? Or was it granted as a steward, like we did for some others (who already were removed)... If the latter, there is no reason in my view at this time to keep it, regardless of any other outcomes, as stewards used to have it to get access to the global log. The log is no longer global, hence no need. ++Lar: t/c 22:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
    - He granted it to himself. [5]. Majorly (talk ) 22:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
      - Thanks for digging that up, Majorly. I would say that's a CU remove then. ++Lar: t/c 23:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep as sysop, but remove CU access. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep - keep his admin, strip him of his self-given CU. --Anonymous Dissident ^Talk 12:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove CU.--Cato 22:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Remove Remove as CU... Keep Keep - as Admin ...--Comet styles 19:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Sean Whitton

Sean Whitton (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Neutral Neutral Inactive for 2 months, but he's apparently busy in real life... Majorly (talk ) 11:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Neutral Neutral last admin action last december and only a couple of actions at all, but no problem in him keeping the tools. As Majorly said, it appears he's busy in real life... Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep. I know that Sean is too busy in real life :(. Though he's not going to leave the proect as far as I know — Vasil ievVV 16:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep Current inactive clause says "0 edits within 6 months and 50 edits within a year". He doesn't meet that. --Aphaia 11:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Keep Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]