[OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn PointedEars at web.de
Sat Mar 26 13:58:36 EDT 2016


Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 20:53, cl at isbd.net wrote:
>> I use Python wherever I can and find this list (as a usenet group via
>> gmane) an invaluable help at times.
>>>> Occasionally I have to make forays into Javascript, can anyone
>> recommend a place similar to this list where Javascript questions can
>> be asked? The trouble is that there are very many usenet Javascript
>> lists and it's difficult to guess which one[es] might be good.
>> Perhaps this http://transcrypt.org/ is the way to go? :)

Unfortunately, no. It needs attention from an expert in the targeted field.
To begin with, the “JavaScript” version (actually, only an ECMAScript 
*2015*-compliant version) of the original Python code considers a "class" as 
sealed (properties being only accessor properties with a getter), when in 
Python that is not the case:
class C:
 def foo (self):
 pass
o = C()
C.foo = lambda self, bar: print(bar)
# prints "baz"
o.foo("baz")
Further, to set up multiple inheritance in a conforming implementation of 
ECMAScript, one must not only set up the instance properties as by the 
constructor of a type, but also the *prototype* chain. In fact, a Proxy 
instance would be required to really set up the *emulation* of such a 
branching prototype chain for any ECMAScript object.
This list of implementation mistakes is not exhaustive, but ECMAScript 
implementations are beyond the scope of this newsgroup/mailing list.
-- 
PointedEars
Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.


More information about the Python-list mailing list

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /