RE Module Performance

Fri Jul 12 06:45:57 EDT 2013

Could you explain what you mean? What and where is the new Flexible 
String Representation?
Devyn Collier Johnson
On 07/12/2013 05:23 AM, wxjmfauth at gmail.com wrote:
> Le vendredi 12 juillet 2013 01:44:05 UTC+2, Devyn Collier Johnson a écrit :
>> I recently saw an email in this mailing list about the RE module being
>>>> made slower. I no long have that email. However, I have viewed the
>>>> source for the RE module, but I did not see any code that would slow
>>>> down the script for no valid reason. Can anyone explain what that user
>>>> meant or if I missed that part of the module?
>>>>>>>> Can the RE module be optimized in any way or at least the "re.sub" portion?
>>>>>>>> Mahalo,
>>>>>>>> Devyn Collier Johnson
>>>> DevynCJohnson at Gmail.com
> ----------
>> I would not care too much about the performance
> of re.
>> With the new Flexible String Representation, you
> can use a logarithmic scale to compare re results.
> To be honest, there is improvment if you are an
> ascii user.
>> Am I the only one who tested this? Probably.
>> jmf
>>