On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 00:41, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com>wrote: > In October 2009 there was a short flurry of interest in adding > "sys.implementation" as an object to encapsulate some > implementation-specific information [1]. Does anyone recollect where > this proposal went? Would anyone object to reviving it (or a > variant)? >>I was wondering that myself when looking at imp.source_to_cache() at PyCon. I would still like to see it happen. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20120320/29a3048a/attachment.html>