On 4 July 2011 16:28, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 15:35:55 +0100 > Michael Foord <fuzzyman at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 4 July 2011 08:02, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > > > > > Michael Foord wrote: > > > > > > It would feel cleaner to me if I could make FunctionTypes a set and > use > > >> that as the second argument to isinstance. :-) > > >> > > > > > > Or more generally, any iterable object? > > > > I don't care about any iterable. If a set would work then I'd be happy. > :-) >> Sure, but making it work for tuples and sets, but not other iterables, > would be a pretty lousy API. > I have no *objection* to it working for arbitrary iterables, I just don't care about it. So does this mean no-one has any objections to my suggested change? I'll create an issue. Michael >> Regards >> Antoine. >>> _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20110704/4d45f6d5/attachment.html>