On 03/11/2010 02:41, Michael Foord wrote: >>> On 2 November 2010 22:17, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com > <mailto:ncoghlan at gmail.com>> wrote: >> 2010年11月2日 M.-A. Lemburg <mal at egenix.com <mailto:mal at egenix.com>>: > > You might want to look at the systimes.py module that comes with > pybench > > (see Tools/pybench). This already provides a cross-platform way of > > accessing high accuracy timers for benchmarking and the like. > > > > For obvious reasons this tries to measure run-time, though, and not > > elapsed time. >> I think MAL answered the naming question without even realising it: >> time.elapsed_time(start_time=0) >>>> I'm +1 on the functionality and either elapsed_time or wallclock is > fine with me. >> Perhaps the patch author should decide... >> Michael >elapsed_time! Please! Hate wallclock. Rob Cliffe >>> Cheers, > Nick. >> -- > Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com <mailto:ncoghlan at gmail.com> > | Brisbane, Australia > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas at python.org <mailto:Python-ideas at python.org> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas >>>>> -- > http://www.voidspace.org.uk >>>> _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20101103/55595ab1/attachment.html>