On 29 September 2012 07:50, Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney at gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 September 2012 06:51, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Wow! I had no idea cdecimal was that close in speed to float. That's >> seriously impressive. >>>> If those numbers are similar in other benchmarks, would it be accurate > and/or reasonable to include a statement along the lines of: >> "comparable to float performance - usually no more than 3x for > calculations within the range of numbers covered by float" >> or is there not enough evidence to conclude that? >> Substitute suitable factor for 3x. >> Obviously > And I meant to say congratulations - that's a really impressive result. Oh-oh. The PSU (which does not exist) has found me. I must hi Tim Delaney -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120929/79233f1c/attachment-0001.html>