On May 31, 2012 1:31 AM, "Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote: >> Agreed this could go on the tracker, but I don't see the need for a Python-Ideas detour. +1 > It seems worth fixing (and I vaguely recall there was some follow-up last time?). You may be thinking of the abstract property fixes that went in - I'm fairly sure this specific problem report fell through the cracks. Cheers, Nick. -- Sent from my phone, thus the relative brevity :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120531/4a044dd3/attachment.html>