[Python-Dev] Marking packaging-related PEPs as Finished after fixing some bugs in them

Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Feb 27 12:50:25 CET 2012


On 2012年2月27日 11:40:08 +0100
Éric Araujo <merwok at netwok.org> wrote:
>> In PEP 386, the rule that versions using an 'rc' marker should sort
> after 'c' is buggy: I don’t think anyone will disagree that 1.0rc1 ==
> 1.0c1 and 1.0rc1 < 1.0c2. The 'rc' marker was added by Tarek shortly
> before the PEP was accepted (see
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-January/097041.html),
> and was not discussed. My preferred solution would be to accept 'rc'
> when parsing but then always use 'c' internally and in all output (file
> names, METADATA file, etc.). If it is judged important that projects be
> able to use 'rc' and see it in output, then I’ll have to add special
> cases in __eq__ and __hash__ methods, which is feasible if inelegant.

'rc' makes sense to most people while 'c' is generally unheard of.
Regards
Antoine.
>> (Issues found by Josip Djolonga, Alexis Métaireau and I.)
>> Cheers
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-python-dev%40m.gmane.org



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /