[Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review

Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Tue Feb 14 22:59:27 CET 2012

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

(Oops, I sent my email by mistake, here is the end of my email)
> (...) Ah, timedelta case is different. But I already replied to Nick in this
> thread about timedelta. You can also

see arguments against timedelta in the PEP 410.
Victor

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list