[Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed

Yury Selivanov yselivanov.ml at gmail.com
Wed Apr 4 18:29:29 CEST 2012

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 2012年04月03日, at 9:28 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> In the last version of my PEP, time.monotonic() is simply defined as "a monotonic clock (cannot go backward)". There is no more "... best ..." in its definition.

I like the last version of the PEP ;)
-
Yury

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list