[Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues
Ezio Melotti
ezio.melotti at gmail.com
Sat Nov 6 18:25:37 CET 2010
On 06/11/2010 19.01, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 11/6/2010 11:42 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>> On 2010年11月06日 15:38:22 +0100, Georg Brandl<g.brandl at gmx.net>
>> wrote:
>>> Am 06.11.2010 05:44, schrieb Ezio Melotti:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> On 05/11/2010 19.08, Python tracker wrote:
>>>>> ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010年10月29日 - 2010年11月05日)
>>>>> Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
>>>>>>>>>> To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the
>>>>> issue.
>>>>> Do NOT respond to this message.
>>>>>>>>>> Issues counts and deltas:
>>>>> open 2514 (+17)
>> This seems wrong. A default search for open issues returns 2452 and it
> was about the same yesterday just a few hours after the report.
>
That's because the "open" count includes about 25 languishing and 39
pending issues (technically they are still open).
>>>>> closed 19597 (+78)
>>>>> total 22111 (+95)
>>>>>>>> as suggested in recent mails[0][1] I changed these values to represent
>>>> the deltas with the previous week.
>>>> Now let's try to keep the "open" delta negative ;)
>> Since there were more issues closed than opened I think it really was.
> Anyway, we are down 300 from the 2750 peak.
>>>> That is a worthy goal, however the difference between the "open" and
>>> "closed"
>>> deltas is already quite an achievement and shows that our triage works.
Yes, even if having a negative delta would be best, having the "closed"
delta higher than then "open" one is still very good.
So congrats to everyone who worked and works to make this possible.
>>>> Agreed.
>>>> We did have negative open deltas for several weeks running in October.
>> Kudos to everyone involved, and lets do it some more :) I'm looking
>> forward to making a non-trivial dent in the open count during the bug
>> weekend on the 20th/21st.
>Best Regards,
Ezio Melotti
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list