[Python-Dev] Proposal: add odict to collections

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sun Jun 15 10:03:02 CEST 2008


Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> I don't favor one over the other. Am just pointing-out that the 
> proposal is a little more complex than simply wishing for an ordered 
> verion of a dictionary and expecting that that wish is self-defining in 
> a way the matches everyone's intuition, use cases, and expectations.

If you have an odict with first-insertion ordering, it's fairly trivial 
to convert it to a dictionary with last-insertion ordering:
class odictlastinsertion(odict):
 def __setitem__(self, k, v):
 self.pop(k, None)
 self[k] = v
As you note, going the other way would be rather difficult, suggesting 
that the version ordered by the first key insertion is the more 
fundamental structure.
A PEP would definitely be needed to thrash out those kind of issues and 
decisions though
Cheers,
Nick.
-- 
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
 http://www.boredomandlaziness.org


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /