On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote: > Benjamin Peterson wrote: >>>> Yes, indeed. We should make sure, however, that the changes in the 2.6 >> libraries are the absolute minimum to get the job done. (I'm trying to >> pretend like this isn't violating the prohibition on all-inclusive >> overhauls in the stdlib.) >>> The prohibition is on *gratuitous* changes, basically along the lines of "if > it ain't broke, don't fix it". The stdlib is definitely broken if it raises > warnings of that kind. Just because it's massive breakage fixage doesn't mean that it's unlikely to break something else. :) >> regards > Steve > -- > Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 > Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/ >> _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/musiccomposition%40gmail.com > -- Cheers, Benjamin Peterson "There's no place like 127.0.0.1."