[Python-Dev] Merging flow

Benjamin Peterson musiccomposition at gmail.com
Thu Dec 4 19:57:34 CET 2008


On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Eric Smith <eric at trueblade.com> wrote:
> Christian Heimes wrote:
>>>> Several people have asked about the patch and merge flow. Now that Python
>> 3.0 is out it's a bit more complicated.
>>>> Flow diagram
>> ------------
>>>> trunk ---> release26-maint
>> \-> py3k ---> release30-maint
>>>>>> Patches for all versions of Python should land in the trunk. They are then
>> merged into release26-maint and py3k branches. Changes for Python 3.0 are
>> merged via the py3k branch.
>> Apologies if this has been discussed before. I looked but didn't see
> anything.
>> Given that at least 99% of the changes for the trunk will not get merged
> into release26-maint, doesn't it make more sense to merge the other way?
> That is, anything that gets checked in to release26-maint would potentially
> be merged into trunk. That would remove the huge number of merge blocks that
> will otherwise be required. Same fore py3k and release30-maint.

I think the percentage is a bit lower than that. Also, we haven't been
using blocking with the maintenance branch so far; svnmerge.py is just
a convenience. (It generates commit messages and has a simpler
interface than a simple "svn merge" command.)
-- 
Cheers,
Benjamin Peterson
"There's nothing quite as beautiful as an oboe... except a chicken
stuck in a vacuum cleaner."


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /