[Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks

Thu Jun 8 12:48:07 CEST 2006

M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Still, here's the timeit.py measurement of the PythonFunctionCall
> test (note that I've scaled down the test in terms of number
> of rounds for timeit.py):
>> Python 2.4:
> 10 loops, best of 3: 21.9 msec per loop
> 10 loops, best of 3: 21.8 msec per loop
> 10 loops, best of 3: 21.8 msec per loop
> 10 loops, best of 3: 21.9 msec per loop
> 10 loops, best of 3: 21.9 msec per loop
>> Python 2.5 as of last night:
> 100 loops, best of 3: 18 msec per loop
> 100 loops, best of 3: 18.4 msec per loop
> 100 loops, best of 3: 18.4 msec per loop
> 100 loops, best of 3: 18.2 msec per loop
>> The pybench 2.0 result:
>> PythonFunctionCalls: 130ms 108ms +21.3% 132ms 109ms +20.9%
>> Looks about right, I'd say.

If the pybench result is still 2.5 first, then the two results are 
contradictory - your timeit results are showing Python 2.5 as being faster 
(assuming the headings are on the right blocks of tests).
Cheers,
Nick.
-- 
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
 http://www.boredomandlaziness.org