[Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict

Sun Feb 19 04:57:35 CET 2006

Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Adam Olsen wrote:
>>>Still -1. It's better, but it violates the principle of encapsulation
>>by mixing how-you-use-it state with what-it-stores state. In doing
>>that it has the potential to break an API documented as accepting a
>>dict. Code that expects d[key] to raise an exception (and catches the
>>resulting KeyError) will now silently "succeed".
>>> Of course it will, and without quotes. That's the whole point.
>>>>I believe that necessitates a PEP to document it.
>>> You are missing the rationale of the PEP process. The point is
> *not* documentation. The point of the PEP process is to channel
> and collect discussion, so that the BDFL can make a decision.
> The BDFL is not bound at all to the PEP process.
>> To document things, we use (or should use) documentation.
>>One could wish this ideal had been the case for the import extensions 
defined in PEP 302.
regards
 Steve
-- 
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC www.holdenweb.com
PyCon TX 2006 www.python.org/pycon/