[Python-Dev] plans for 2.4.2 and 2.5a1

Fri Aug 12 13:29:49 CEST 2005

Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> writes:
> So I'm currently planning for a 2.4.2 sometime around mid September. I figure 
> we cut a release candidate either on the 7th or 14th, and a final a week 
> later. 

Cool. I'm not sure how many outstanding bugs should be fixed before
2.4.2. Some stuff to do with files with PEP 263 style declarations?
(Walter? I've lost track of these).
I think I should probably just check my fix for "PyXxx_Check(x) trusts
x->ob_type->tp_mro" (http://python.org/sf/1153075) in to both
branches, unless someone can think of a good reason not to (Armin?).
(The whole area could do with some work, really, but that's another
story).
> In addition, I'd like to suggest we think about a first alpha of 2.5 sometime 
> during March 2006, with a final release sometime around May-June. This would 
> mean (assuming people are happy with this) we need to make a list of what's 
> still outstanding for 2.5. There's a bunch of accepted PEPs that are waiting 
> for code. Once that's done, there will be a final 2.4.3 sometime after or 
> close to the 2.5 final release.

I have some outstanding patches:
1) My PEP 343 implementation (http://python.org/sf/1235943). Needs
 reviewing, but docs are in another patch. I also recently realized
 that my patch is incomplete, we should accept stuff like this:
 with cm as (a,b,c): ...
 where cm.__enter__ returns a 3-sequence. My patch just allows a
 NAME after the 'as' pseudo-keyword (if anyone else wants to fix
 this, be my guest :)
2) The new-style exceptions patch (http://python.org/sf/1104669).
 This mostly needs documentation, but could also do with
 review/testing.
3) "explicit sign variable for longs" (http://python.org/sf/1177779).
 This is a user-invisible patch, really, so I'm not so concerned
 about it (I'd like to follow it up by emitting DeprecationWarnings
 on ob_size abuse in 2.6 and disallowing it in 2.7 -- or maybe we
 could even emit DeprecationWarnings in 2.5 already).
4) "__slots__ for subclasses of variable length types"
 (http://python.org/sf/1173475) -- this is very pie-in-the-sky and
 in fact the attached patch is completely broken, but I think work
 in this area would still be a good thing. Review the others before
 looking at this one, please :)
... then there's the ast-branch, of course ...
Is there a 2.5 release PEP yet?
Cheers,
mwh
-- 
 If i don't understand lisp, it would be wise to not bray about
 how lisp is stupid or otherwise criticize, because my stupidity
 would be archived and open for all in the know to see.
 -- Xah, comp.lang.lisp