Tim Peters <tim.one@comcast.net> writes: > I haven't identified any frightening downside to letting pymalloc run all > the way to 256, except that it's going to consume 4K if there's a single > object of any given multiple-of-8 size. I also wonder whether it might be sensible to space the size classes 16 bytes apart, thus reducing the number of classes to 16. Regards, Martin