aahz@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes: > Figured this should be moved. Probably right. Slightly surprisingly, there doesn't seem to be a sf support request on this issue -- maybe it's just us? I'll file one... here: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=529477&group_id=1&atid=200001 Cheers, M. > ------- start of forwarded message ------- > Newsgroups: comp.lang.python > From: Michael Hudson <mwh@python.net> > Subject: Re: zlib vulnerabilities and python > Message-ID: <u8z8wsey5.fsf@python.net> > References: <SASl3IAyAUj8EwS4@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> <a6nnsg$chc$1@panix1.panix.com> > Date: 2002年3月13日 14:43:13 GMT >> aahz@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes: >> > In article <SASl3IAyAUj8EwS4@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk>, > > Robin Becker <robin@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> wrote: > >> > >>Does the recent zlib double free vulnerability > >>http://news.com.com/2100-1001-857008.html > >>impact zlib.pyd? > > > > Dunno, but I filed a SF bug to check compatibility with the new 1.1.4. >> But because mail from the sf tracker seems to be hitting the bit > bucket, noone knows about this. >> Time to look at roundup again? The tracker on sf is starting to piss > me off (even more). >> Cheers, > M. >> -- > We've had a lot of problems going from glibc 2.0 to glibc 2.1. > People claim binary compatibility. Except for functions they > don't like. -- Peter Van Eynde, comp.lang.lisp > ------- end of forwarded message ------- >>> _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > -- 42. You can measure a programmer's perspective by noting his attitude on the continuing vitality of FORTRAN. -- Alan Perlis, http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/perlis-alan/quotes.html