[Python-Dev] Re: Python 2.1 slower than 2.0

2001年1月29日 14:18:52 +0100

"M.-A. Lemburg" wrote:
>> Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> >
> > mal wrote:
> > > UnicodeMappings: 1631.65 ms 90.65 us +42.76%
> > > UnicodePredicates: 1762.10 ms 7.83 us +15.99%
> > > UnicodeProperties: 1410.80 ms 7.05 us +19.57%
> > > UnicodeSlicing: 1366.20 ms 7.81 us +19.23%
> > >
> > > Unicode mappings and other Unicode database related methods
> > > show the effect of the compression of the Unicode database -- a
> > > clear space/speed tradeoff.
> >
> > umm. the tests don't seem to test the "\N{name}" escapes, so the
> > only thing that has changed in 2.1 is the "decomposition" method
> > (used in the UnicodeProperties test).
>> The mappings figure surprised me too: the code has not changed,
> but the unicodetype_db.h look different. Don't know how this
> affects performance though.
>> The differences could also be explained by a increase in Unicode
> object creation time (the concatenation is also a lot slower),
> so perhaps that's where we should look...
>> > are you sure you're comparing against 2.0 final?
>> Yes... after a check of the Makefile I found that I had compiled
> Python 2.0 with -O3 and 2.1a1 with -O2 -- perhaps this makes
> a difference w/r to inlining of code. I'll recompile and rerun
> the benchmark.

Looks like there is an effect of choosing -O3 over -O2 (even though
not necessarily positive all the way); what results do you get on
Windows ?
--
PYBENCH 0.7
Benchmark: /home/lemburg/tmp/pybench-2.1a1.pyb (rounds=10, warp=20)
Tests: per run per oper. diff *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 BuiltinFunctionCalls: 1065.10 ms 8.35 us +3.93%
 BuiltinMethodLookup: 1286.30 ms 2.45 us +39.12%
 ConcatStrings: 1243.30 ms 8.29 us +15.80%
 ConcatUnicode: 1449.10 ms 9.66 us -5.83%
 CreateInstances: 1639.25 ms 39.03 us +7.95%
 CreateStringsWithConcat: 1453.45 ms 7.27 us +9.73%
 CreateUnicodeWithConcat: 1558.45 ms 7.79 us +8.19%
 DictCreation: 1869.35 ms 12.46 us +8.77%
 ForLoops: 1526.85 ms 152.69 us -1.03%
 IfThenElse: 1381.00 ms 2.05 us +12.09%
 ListSlicing: 547.40 ms 156.40 us -5.52%
 NestedForLoops: 824.50 ms 2.36 us -1.56%
 NormalClassAttribute: 1233.55 ms 2.06 us +4.96%
 NormalInstanceAttribute: 1215.50 ms 2.03 us +16.37%
 PythonFunctionCalls: 1107.30 ms 6.71 us +10.55%
 PythonMethodCalls: 1047.00 ms 13.96 us +26.34%
 Recursion: 940.35 ms 75.23 us +23.47%
 SecondImport: 894.05 ms 35.76 us +0.59%
 SecondPackageImport: 915.05 ms 36.60 us +2.14%
 SecondSubmoduleImport: 1131.10 ms 45.24 us +0.56%
 SimpleComplexArithmetic: 1652.05 ms 7.51 us +6.67%
 SimpleDictManipulation: 1150.25 ms 3.83 us +18.72%
 SimpleFloatArithmetic: 889.65 ms 1.62 us -1.52%
 SimpleIntFloatArithmetic: 900.80 ms 1.36 us -0.40%
 SimpleIntegerArithmetic: 901.75 ms 1.37 us -0.72%
 SimpleListManipulation: 1125.40 ms 4.17 us +4.15%
 SimpleLongArithmetic: 1305.15 ms 7.91 us +7.62%
 SmallLists: 2102.85 ms 8.25 us +8.18%
 SmallTuples: 1329.55 ms 5.54 us +4.98%
 SpecialClassAttribute: 1234.60 ms 2.06 us +19.23%
 SpecialInstanceAttribute: 1422.55 ms 2.37 us +11.28%
 StringMappings: 1585.55 ms 12.58 us +11.46%
 StringPredicates: 1241.35 ms 4.43 us -9.69%
 StringSlicing: 1206.20 ms 6.89 us +15.12%
 TryExcept: 1764.35 ms 1.18 us -0.81%
 TryRaiseExcept: 1217.40 ms 81.16 us +2.77%
 TupleSlicing: 933.00 ms 8.89 us -1.90%
 UnicodeMappings: 1137.35 ms 63.19 us -0.49%
 UnicodePredicates: 1632.05 ms 7.25 us +7.43%
 UnicodeProperties: 1244.05 ms 6.22 us +5.44%
 UnicodeSlicing: 1252.10 ms 7.15 us +9.27%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Average round time: 58804.00 ms +4.73%
*) measured against: /home/lemburg/tmp/pybench-2.0.pyb (rounds=10, warp=20)
-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
______________________________________________________________________
Company: http://www.egenix.com/
Consulting: http://www.lemburg.com/
Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/