[Python-Dev] 2.1 alpha: what about the unicode name database?
M.-A. Lemburg
mal@lemburg.com
2001年1月15日 10:44:14 +0100
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>> The name database portions of SF task 17335 ("add
> compressed unicode database") were postponed to
> 2.1.
>> My current patch replaces the ~450k large ucnhash
> module with a new ~160k large module. (See earlier
> posts for more info on how the new database works).
>> Should I check it in?
Since the Unicode character names are probably
not used for performance sensitive tasks, I suggest to
checkin the smallest version possible.
If it is too much work to get Finn's version recoded in C
(presuming it's written in Java), then I'd suggest checking
in your version until someone comes up with a yet smaller
edition.
Thanks,
--
Marc-Andre Lemburg
______________________________________________________________________
Company: http://www.egenix.com/
Consulting: http://www.lemburg.com/
Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/