[Python-checkins] peps: remove mystery R & B columns

Wed Mar 23 21:26:43 CET 2011

http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/dee33e35fa8e
changeset: 146:dee33e35fa8e
user: Jeremy Hylton <jeremy at alum.mit.edu>
date: Wed Aug 23 14:34:25 2000 +0000
summary:
 remove mystery R & B columns
files:
 pep-0200.txt | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pep-0200.txt b/pep-0200.txt
--- a/pep-0200.txt
+++ b/pep-0200.txt
@@ -86,18 +86,16 @@
 anyway, but that's another matter.) If the test cases are known
 to fail, they serve no useful purpose.
 
- [what are the "R" and "B" columns supposed to mean? - tim]
-
- test case platform R B date reported
- --------- -------- - - -------------
- test_parser Windows ? ? 22-Aug-2000
+ test case platform date reported
+ --------- -------- -------------
+ test_parser Windows 22-Aug-2000
 [probably all platforms]
 
- test_posixpath Windows ? ? 22-Aug-2000
+ test_posixpath Windows 22-Aug-2000
 [probably all platforms; think it's because Skip backed out
 commonpathprefix changes but didn't change the tests]
 
- test_fork1 Linux X 26-Jul-2000 just SMP?
+ test_fork1 Linux 26-Jul-2000 
 [no clue; there are probably two bugs here]
 [19-Aug-200 tim
 Charles Waldman whipped up a patch to give child processes a new
@@ -113,9 +111,9 @@
 If you find a test bouncing between this section and the previous one,
 the code it's testing is in trouble!
 
- test case platform R B date reported
- --------- -------- - - -------------
- test_popen2 Win32 X X 26-Jul-2000
+ test case platform date reported
+ --------- -------- -------------
+ test_popen2 Win32 26-Jul-2000
 [20-Aug-2000 tim
 changed the popen2.py _test function to use the "more" cmd
 when os.name == "nt". This makes test_popen2 pass under
@@ -133,14 +131,14 @@
 the code.
 ]
 
- test_winreg Win32 X X 26-Jul-2000
+ test_winreg Win32 26-Jul-2000
 [works 15-Aug-2000 for me, on Win98 - tim]
 
- test_mmap Win32 X X 26-Jul-2000
+ test_mmap Win32 26-Jul-2000
 [believe that was fixed by Mark H.]
 [works 15-Aug-2000 for me, on Win98 - tim]
 
- test_longexp Win98+? ? ? 15-Aug-2000
+ test_longexp Win98+? 15-Aug-2000
 [fails in release build,
 passes in release build under verbose mode but doesn't
 look like it should pass,
@@ -161,7 +159,7 @@
 in some cases where the test fails without -v
 ]
 
- test_winreg2 Win32 X X 26-Jul-2000
+ test_winreg2 Win32 26-Jul-2000
 [20-Aug-2000 tim - the test has been removed from the project]
 [19-Aug-2000 tim
 This test will never work on Win98, because it's looking for
-- 
Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/peps
