[Python-checkins] peps: Moderate first formatting pass of Jeremy's content for this PEP.
georg.brandl
python-checkins at python.org
Wed Mar 23 21:22:42 CET 2011
http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/109f5829f49a
changeset: 24:109f5829f49a
user: Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org>
date: Fri Jul 21 18:13:15 2000 +0000
summary:
Moderate first formatting pass of Jeremy's content for this PEP.
files:
pep-0200.txt | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pep-0200.txt b/pep-0200.txt
--- a/pep-0200.txt
+++ b/pep-0200.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
PEP: 200
Title: Python 2.0 Release Schedule
Version: $Revision$
-Owner: bwarsaw at beopen.com (Barry A. Warsaw)
+Owner: Jeremy Hylton <jeremy at beopen.com>
Python-Version: 2.0
Status: Incomplete
@@ -14,6 +14,63 @@
CVS revision history of this file contains the definitive
historical record.
+Accepted and completed
+
+Accepted and in progress
+
+ * SyntaxError enhancements - Fredrik Lundh
+ http://www.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-July/012981.html
+
+ * interface to poll system call - Andrew Kuchling
+ An OO interface to the poll system call will be added to the
+ select module.
+
+ * Compression of Unicode database - Fredrik Lundh
+ http://hem.passagen.se/eff/bot.htm#456806
+
+ * SRE - Fredrik Lundh
+ The test suite still fails on test_re.
+
+ * snprintf - owner???
+ Use snprintf to avoid buffer overflows. Need configure hackery
+ to discovery if it is available on the current platform and a
+ default implementation if it is not.
+ http://www.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-April/010051.html
+ This function is expected to be part of C9X (check).
+
+ * Support for opcode arguments > 2**16 - Charles Waldman
+ Source files longer than 32K and sequences with more than 32K
+ elements both fail because opcode arguments are limited to
+ 16-bit values.
+
+ * Range literals - Thomas Wouters
+ Make range(1, 10, 2) == [1:10:2]
+
+Open: proposed but not accepted or declined
+
+ * List comprehensions - Tim Peters?
+ Need a coherent proposal. Lots of confusing discussion going
+ on.
+
+ * Eliminated SET_LINENO opcode - Vladimir Marangozov
+ Small optimization achieved by using the code object's lnotab
+ instead of the SET_LINENO instruction. Uses code rewriting
+ technique (that Guido's growns on) to support debugger, which
+ uses SET_LINENO.
+
+ http://starship.python.net/~vlad/lineno/
+ for (working at the time) patches
+
+ Discussions on python-dev:
+
+ - http://www.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-April/subject.html
+ Subject: "Why do we need Traceback Objects?"
+
+ - http://www.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-August/002252.html
+
+Declined
+
+
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
--
Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/peps
More information about the Python-checkins
mailing list