[Python-checkins] r55571 - peps/trunk/pep-0000.txt peps/trunk/pep-3111.txt

Fri May 25 08:17:12 CEST 2007

Author: neal.norwitz
Date: Fri May 25 08:17:11 2007
New Revision: 55571
Modified:
 peps/trunk/pep-0000.txt
 peps/trunk/pep-3111.txt
Log:
PEP 3111 (restoring input) has been implemented so mark it Final.
Also wrap some long lines in the PEP.
Modified: peps/trunk/pep-0000.txt
==============================================================================

--- peps/trunk/pep-0000.txt	(original)
+++ peps/trunk/pep-0000.txt	Fri May 25 08:17:11 2007
@@ -77,7 +77,6 @@
 SA 358 The "bytes" Object Schemenauer, GvR
 SA 3106 Revamping dict.keys(), .values() & .items() GvR
 SA 3109 Raising Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
- SA 3111 Simple input built-in in Python 3000 Roberge
 SA 3112 Bytes literals in Python 3000 Orendorff
 SA 3115 Metaclasses in Python 3000 Talin
 SA 3119 Introducing Abstract Base Classes GvR, Talin
@@ -173,6 +172,7 @@
 SF 3105 Make print a function Brandl
 SF 3107 Function Annotations Winter, Lownds
 SF 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
+ SF 3111 Simple input built-in in Python 3000 Roberge
 SF 3113 Removal of Tuple Parameter Unpacking Cannon
 SF 3114 Renaming iterator.next() to .__next__() Yee
 SF 3129 Class Decorators Winter
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@
 S 3108 Standard Library Reorganization Cannon
 SA 3109 Raising Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
 SF 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
- SA 3111 Simple input built-in in Python 3000 Roberge
+ SF 3111 Simple input built-in in Python 3000 Roberge
 SA 3112 Bytes literals in Python 3000 Orendorff
 SF 3113 Removal of Tuple Parameter Unpacking Cannon
 SF 3114 Renaming iterator.next() to .__next__() Yee
Modified: peps/trunk/pep-3111.txt
==============================================================================
--- peps/trunk/pep-3111.txt	(original)
+++ peps/trunk/pep-3111.txt	Fri May 25 08:17:11 2007
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Version: $Revision$
 Last-Modified: $Date$
 Author: Andre Roberge <andre.roberge at gmail.com >
-Status: Accepted
+Status: Final
 Type: Standards Track
 Content-Type: text/x-rst
 Created: 13-Sep-2006
@@ -108,9 +108,9 @@
 Naming Discussion
 =================
 
-With ``input()`` effectively removed from the language, the name ``raw_input()``
-makes much less sense and alternatives should be considered. The
-various possibilities mentioned in various forums include::
+With ``input()`` effectively removed from the language,
+the name ``raw_input()`` makes much less sense and alternatives should be
+considered. The various possibilities mentioned in various forums include::
 
 ask()
 ask_user()
@@ -121,8 +121,8 @@
 user_input()
 get_response()
 
-While it was initially rejected by the BDFL, it has been suggested that the most
-direct solution would be to rename "raw_input" to "input" in Python 3000. 
+While it was initially rejected by the BDFL, it has been suggested that the
+most direct solution would be to rename "raw_input" to "input" in Python 3000. 
 The main objection is that Python 2.x already has a function named "input",
 and, even though it is not going to be included in Python 3000,
 having a built-in function with the same name but different semantics may
