[Python-checkins] python/nondist/peps pep-0322.txt,1.3,1.4

Fri Sep 26 12:09:56 EDT 2003

Update of /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv11227
Modified Files:
	pep-0322.txt 
Log Message:
Rename the proposal to ireverse().
Index: pep-0322.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps/pep-0322.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -C2 -d -r1.3 -r1.4
*** pep-0322.txt	26 Sep 2003 03:07:56 -0000	1.3
--- pep-0322.txt	26 Sep 2003 16:09:54 -0000	1.4
***************
*** 47,59 ****
 ========

! Add a method called *iter_backwards()* to sequence objects that can
 benefit from it. The above examples then simplify to::

! for i in xrange(n).iter_backwards():
 print seqn[i]

 ::

! for elem in seqn.iter_backwards():
 print elem

--- 47,59 ----
 ========

! Add a method called *ireverse()* to sequence objects that can
 benefit from it. The above examples then simplify to::

! for i in xrange(n).ireverse():
 print seqn[i]

 ::

! for elem in seqn.ireverse():
 print elem

***************
*** 105,109 ****
 and clearer with::

! for func, target, kargs in _exithandlers.iter_backwards():
 . . .
 del _exithandlers
--- 105,109 ----
 and clearer with::

! for func, target, kargs in _exithandlers.ireverse():
 . . .
 del _exithandlers
***************
*** 132,136 ****

 result.sort()
! return [x for score, x in result[-n:].iter_backwards()]

 * heapq.heapify() uses ``for i in xrange(n//2 - 1, -1, -1)`` because
--- 132,136 ----

 result.sort()
! return [x for score, x in result[-n:].ireverse()]

 * heapq.heapify() uses ``for i in xrange(n//2 - 1, -1, -1)`` because
***************
*** 159,163 ****
 be run in a forward direction but is less intuitive and rarely
 presented that way in literature. The replacement code
! ``for i in xrange(1, len(x)).iter_backwards()`` is much easier
 to mentally verify.

--- 159,163 ----
 be run in a forward direction but is less intuitive and rarely
 presented that way in literature. The replacement code
! ``for i in xrange(1, len(x)).ireverse()`` is much easier
 to mentally verify.