[Python-checkins] CVS: python/nondist/peps pep-0204.txt,1.4,1.5

Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:37:39 -0800

Update of /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps
In directory slayer.i.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv6200
Modified Files:
	pep-0204.txt 
Log Message:
Update this PEP to current, harsh, reality. It's been rejected :) If at all
possible, the reasoning should be extended to include the real reasons it
was rejected -- this is just guesswork from my side. (This means you, Guido,
or anyone who can channel Guido enough to call himself Guido.)
Index: pep-0204.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps/pep-0204.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -C2 -r1.4 -r1.5
*** pep-0204.txt	2000年08月23日 05:41:57	1.4
--- pep-0204.txt	2000年11月01日 22:37:36	1.5
***************
*** 3,7 ****
 Version: $Revision$
 Author: thomas@xs4all.net (Thomas Wouters)
! Status: Draft
 Type: Standards Track
 Python-Version: 2.0
--- 3,7 ----
 Version: $Revision$
 Author: thomas@xs4all.net (Thomas Wouters)
! Status: Rejected
 Type: Standards Track
 Python-Version: 2.0
***************
*** 263,267 ****
 to be classified: are they part of the API, or should they be
 made private functions?
! 
 
 References:
--- 263,281 ----
 to be classified: are they part of the API, or should they be
 made private functions?
! 
! 
! Rejection
! 
! After careful consideration, and a period of meditation, this
! proposal has been rejected. The open issues, as well as some
! confusion between ranges and slice syntax, raised enough questions
! for Guido not to accept it for Python 2.0, and later to reject the
! proposal altogether. The new syntax and its intentions were deemed
! not obvious enough.
! 
! [ TBD: Guido, ammend/confirm this, please. Preferably both; this
! is a PEP, it should contain *all* the reasons for rejection
! and/or reconsideration, for future reference. ]
! 
 
 References: