James Browning <jamesbrowning137%gmail.com@localhost> writes: > maintainers at their own discretion. Some of you brought up the concern of > over-automating the system at the potential risk of the configuration system > becoming too opaque and administrators allowing packages to configure inetd > without their knowledge of what is happening. However, we believe that with As I read it, that was mostly mouse@. My take was that most of the concerns were about not making it super complicated and maintaining backwards compat.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature