tech-userlevel archive

---

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: 16bit ctype table

---

• To: tech-userlevel%NetBSD.org@localhost
• Subject: Re: 16bit ctype table
• From: Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>
• Date: 2012年8月20日 05:06:59 -0400 (EDT)

---

> Looks good, but why CTYPE_B -> CTYPE_BL? Just curious?
I wondered the same thing. It's explained in comments in the patch;
it's for historical/compatability reasons.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

---

• References:
  • 16bit ctype table
    • From: Joerg Sonnenberger
  • Re: 16bit ctype table
    • From: Christos Zoulas

---

• Prev by Date: Re: 16bit ctype table
• Next by Date: Re: 16bit ctype table
• Previous by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
• Next by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
• Indexes:
  • reverse Date
  • reverse Thread
  • Old Index

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index