On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 06:30:14PM -0600, Dad - Kent - wrote: > > IMO, this is pretty much a no-brainer. With ksh93 performance, > it's functionality, continued development and improvement, and the > fact it is becoming the defacto standard, I think ksh93 should be > the default / base shell in NetBSD. So we should just ignore the license issues? Thor