tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Semantics of copying mutex/rwlock

To: Denis Lagno <dlagno%rambler.ru@localhost>
Subject: Re: Semantics of copying mutex/rwlock
From: Sad Clouds <cryintothebluesky%googlemail.com@localhost>
Date: 2010年6月16日 16:47:02 +0100

On 2010年6月16日 19:38:25 +0400
Denis Lagno <dlagno%rambler.ru@localhost> wrote:
> > > memcpy(&new_mutex, &old_mutex, sizeof(pthread_mutex_t))
> 
> > Maybe - but maybe not.
> 
> At least it should be safe to copy PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER, I guess?
I think the macro only works with statically allocated objects.

References:
- Semantics of copying mutex/rwlock
  - From: Sad Clouds
- Re: Semantics of copying mutex/rwlock
  - From: der Mouse
- Re: Semantics of copying mutex/rwlock
  - From: Denis Lagno

Prev by Date: Re: Semantics of copying mutex/rwlock
Next by Date: Re: Semantics of copying mutex/rwlock
Previous by Thread: Re: Semantics of copying mutex/rwlock
Next by Thread: Re: Semantics of copying mutex/rwlock
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index