Re: [Python-Dev] Strange umask(?)/st_mode issue
On 02.04.2019 1:44, Steve Dower wrote: On 01Apr2019 1535, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 01Apr2019 09:12, Steve Dower wrote: On 30Mar2019 1130, Gregory P. Smith wrote: I wouldn't expect it to be the case in a CI environment but I believe a umask can be overridden if the filesystem is mounted and c
Re: [Python-Dev] Strange umask(?)/st_mode issue
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 4:49 PM Cameron Simpson wrote:> On 01Apr2019 15:44, Steve Dower wrote:>>On 01Apr2019 1535, Cameron Simpson wrote:>>>On 01Apr2019 09:12, Steve Dower wrote:>>>>On 30Mar2019 1130, Gregory P. Smith wrote:> I wouldn't expect it to be the case in a CI environment bu
Re: [Python-Dev] Strange umask(?)/st_mode issue
On 01Apr2019 15:44, Steve Dower wrote: On 01Apr2019 1535, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 01Apr2019 09:12, Steve Dower wrote: On 30Mar2019 1130, Gregory P. Smith wrote: I wouldn't expect it to be the case in a CI environment but I believe a umask can be overridden if the filesystem is mounted and
Re: [Python-Dev] Strange umask(?)/st_mode issue
On 01Apr2019 1535, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 01Apr2019 09:12, Steve Dower wrote: On 30Mar2019 1130, Gregory P. Smith wrote: I wouldn't expect it to be the case in a CI environment but I believe a umask can be overridden if the filesystem is mounted and configured with acls set? (oh, hah, Iva
Re: [Python-Dev] Strange umask(?)/st_mode issue
On 01Apr2019 09:12, Steve Dower wrote: On 30Mar2019 1130, Gregory P. Smith wrote: I wouldn't expect it to be the case in a CI environment but I believe a umask can be overridden if the filesystem is mounted and configured with acls set? (oh, hah, Ivan just said the same thing) Yep, it appea
Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 578: Python Runtime Audit Hooks
On 30Mar2019 0913, Steve Dower wrote: On 30Mar.2019 0747, Nick Coghlan wrote: I like this PEP in principle, but the specific "open_for_import" name bothers me a lot, as it implies that "importing" is the only situation where a file will be opened for code execution. If this part of the API were
Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 578: Python Runtime Audit Hooks
On 31Mar2019 0538, Christian Heimes wrote: I don't like the fact that the PEP requires users to learn and use an additional layer to handle native code. Although we cannot provide a fully secure hook for native code, we could at least try to provide a best effort hook and document the limitations
Re: [Python-Dev] Strange umask(?)/st_mode issue
On 30Mar2019 1130, Gregory P. Smith wrote: I wouldn't expect it to be the case in a CI environment but I believe a umask can be overridden if the filesystem is mounted and configured with acls set? (oh, hah, Ivan just said the same thing) Yep, it appears this is the case. The Pipelines team g
Re: [Python-Dev] Removing PendingDeprecationWarning
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 7:31 PM Nick Coghlan wrote:>> That's just a documentation fix: "If you're not sure whether to use> DeprecationWarning or PendingDeprecationWarning, use> DeprecationWarning".> Current proposed patch is: """ .. note:: PendingDeprecationWarning was introduced as an "