Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 448 review
Hi everyone, I was wondering what is left with the PEP 448 ( http://bugs.python.org/issue2292) code review? Big thanks to Benjamin, Ethan, and Serhiy for reviewing some (all?) of the code. What is the next step of this process? Thanks, Neil On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Neil Girdhar wrote
Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 489: Redesigning extension module loading
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Jim J. Jewett wrote:>> On 16 March 2015 Petr Viktorin wrote:>>> If PyModuleCreate is not defined, PyModuleExec is expected to operate>> on any Python object for which attributes can be added by PyObject_GetAttr*>> and retrieved by PyObject_SetAttr*.>> I ass
Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 489: Redesigning extension module loading
On 16 March 2015 Petr Viktorin wrote:> If PyModuleCreate is not defined, PyModuleExec is expected to operate> on any Python object for which attributes can be added by PyObject_GetAttr*> and retrieved by PyObject_SetAttr*. I assume it is the other way around (add with Set and retrieve with Ge
[Python-Dev] PEP 489: Redesigning extension module loading
Hello, On import-sig, I've agreed to continue Nick Coghlan's work on making extension modules act more like Python ones, work well with PEP 451 (ModuleSpec), and encourage proper subinterpreter and reloading support. Here is the resulting PEP. I don't have a patch yet, but I'm working on it.