Nathaniel Smith writes: > Issue 1: Python's built-in IDNA implementation is wrong (implements > IDNA 2003, not IDNA 2008).
Is "wrong" the right word here? I'll grant you that 2008 is *better*, but typically in practice versions coexist for years. Ie, is there no backward compatibility issue with registries that specified IDNA 2003? This is not entirely an idle question: I'd like to tool up on the RFCs, research existing practice (especially in the East/Southeast Asian registries), and contribute to the implementation if there may be an issue remaining. (Interpreting RFCs is something I'm reasonably good at.) Steve _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com