On 2017年12月14日 15:05:02 +0100 Petr Viktorin <[email protected]> wrote: > > PEP 489 gives you good defaults, if you use it and avoid global state > (roughly: C-level mutable static variables), then you should get > multi-interpreter support for free in simple cases. > It's also possible to use PyModule_GetState() and other APIs directly. > However, I'd like to avoid solving subinterpreter support separately > (and slightly differently) in each module.
My question is: can you get multi-interpreter support *without* PEP 489? That is, using single-phase initialization and PyModule_GetState(). > For a slightly bigger picture: as a part-time internship, Marcel is > identifying where PEP 489 is inadequate, and solving the problems for > the complex cases. Is Marcel mentored by anyone in particular? > I'm assuming fixing the atexit bug from 2009 [0] can be delayed a bit as > issues with PEP 489 are investigated & solved. > Does that sound fair? Probably, but the atexit bug deserves fixing in itself. If a fix is ready, it would be a pity not to let it in. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com