On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Mike Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> This thread isn't about the numerous third-party solutions that are a pip > command away. But rather getting a minimal return parser to handle > datetime.isoformat() into the std library. > > It's been needed for years, indeed what is the holdup? I don't recall anyone saying it was a bad idea in the last discussion. Do we just need an implementation? Is the one in the Bug Report not up to snuff? If not, then what's wrong with it? This is just not that hard a problem to solve. -CHB > and hopefully someone can squeeze it into 3.7 before its too late. (It > takes years for a new version to trickle down to Linux dists.) > > -Mike > > > On 2017年11月28日 13:09, Skip Montanaro wrote: > >> It's got its own little parsing language, different than the usual >> > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/chris. > barker%40noaa.gov > > -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com