Re: [Python-Dev] RFC: Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7

2017年6月05日 18:02:41 -0700

On Jun 5, 2017 7:01 AM, "Nick Coghlan" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 5 June 2017 at 21:44, Donald Stufft <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is pip allowed to use the hypothetical _ensurepip_ssl outside of
ensurepip?
Yes, so something like _tls_bootstrap would probably be a better name
for the helper module (assuming we go down the "private API to
bootstrap 3rd party SSL modules" path).
It seems like there's a risk here that we end up with two divergent copies
of ssl.py and _ssl.c inside the python 2 tree, and that this will make it
harder to do future bug fixing and backports. Is this going to cause
problems? Is there any way to mitigate them?
-n
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to