On 10 December 2016 at 18:18, Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> wrote: > On Dec 10, 2016, at 07:09 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > >>I seem to recall that when we discussed the future of Python 2.x, and the >>decision that 2.7 would be the final version and there would be no 2.8, we >>reached a consensus that if anyone did backport Python 3 features to a Python >>2 fork, they should not call it Python 2.8 as that could mislead people into >>thinking it was officially supported. >> >>I think the project should be renamed to make it clear that its a fork, >>like Stackless. > > Yes, exactly right. It's not sanctioned by the PSF and should not be called > "Python" anything.
NorwegianBlue would be thematically appropriate ;) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com