On Dec 10, 2016, at 07:09 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >I seem to recall that when we discussed the future of Python 2.x, and the >decision that 2.7 would be the final version and there would be no 2.8, we >reached a consensus that if anyone did backport Python 3 features to a Python >2 fork, they should not call it Python 2.8 as that could mislead people into >thinking it was officially supported. > >I think the project should be renamed to make it clear that its a fork, >like Stackless.
Yes, exactly right. It's not sanctioned by the PSF and should not be called "Python" anything. -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com