On 13.09.2016 20:21, Tres Seaver wrote:
*Lots* of library authors have to straddle Python versions: consumers of
those libraries only get to pick and choose when their code is at the
"leaf" of the dependency tree (the application).
Maybe, I didn't express myself well but this was not my intended
question. Using this argument for not driving the evolution of the
language spec, doesn't seem reasonable. Changes are necessary from time
to time and this one in particular is not breaking compatibility with
older versions. So, existing libs are okay. But why shouldn't the
ordering of dicts not be an advertisable feature for application
developers or developers of future libs? My reasoning so far is that in
those circumstances people **won't switch** from CPython 3.6 to Cython
to PyPy back to CPython 2.7 once a week (drawn from my experience at
least). But maybe I'm wrong here.
Cheers,
Sven
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com