On Jun 09, 2016, at 03:22 PM, Larry Hastings wrote: >On 06/09/2016 08:52 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> That leaves direct calls to os.urandom(). I don't think this should > block >> either. > >Then it's you and me against the rest of the world ;-)
FWIW, I agree with you and Guido. I'm also not opposed to adding a more direct exposure of getrandom(), but in Python 3.6 only. Like it or not, that's the right approach for our backward compatibility policies. Cheers, -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com