On Wed, Apr 13, 2016, at 10:21, Nick Coghlan wrote: > I'd expect the main consumers to be os and os.path, and would honestly > be surprised if we needed many explicit invocations above that layer, > other than in pathlib itself.
I made a toy implementation to try this out, and making os.open support it does not get you builtin open "for free" as I had suspected; builtin open has its own type checks in _iomodule.c. Probably anything not implemented in pure python that deals with filenames is going to have to have its type checking revised. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com