On 02/11/2016 06:19 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: >> Thanks for the alternate patch. I used the two-function approach you took >> in ast.c for my latest revision. >> >> I still think that some cases (like two of the examples in the PEP, >> 0b_1111_0000 and 1.5_j) are worth having, and therefore a more relaxed >> rule is preferable. > > Should I write an alternative PEP for strong rule?
That seems excessive for a minor point. Let's collect feedback for a few days, and we can also collect some informal votes. In the end, I suspect that Guido will let us know about his preference for one of the possibilities, and when he does, I will update the PEP accordingly. cheers, Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com