On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Yury Selivanov <[email protected]>
wrote:
Nathaniel,
On 2015年04月29日 7:35 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
What I do feel strongly about
is that whatever syntax we end up with, there should be*some*
accurate human-readable description of*what it is*. AFAICT the PEP
currently doesn't have that.
How to define human-readable description of how unary
minus operator works?
In a PEP you should probably give grammar that is not the actual grammar
from the implementation, but matches the grammar used in the reference
manual on docs.python.org.