Re: [Python-Dev] (no subject)

2015年2月09日 16:41:48 -0800

What's an example of a way inspect.signature must change? I thought PEP 448 added new unpacking shortcuts which (for example) change the *caller* side of a function call. I didn't realize it impacted the *callee* side too.
//arry/
On 02/09/2015 03:14 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On 2015年2月10日 08:43:53 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote:
For example, the potential for arcane call arguments suggests the need for
a PEP 8 addition saying "first standalone args, then iterable expansions,
then mapping expansions", even though syntactically any order would now be
permitted at call time.
There are other concerns:
- inspect.signature() must be updated to cover the new call
 possibilities
- function call performance must not be crippled by the new
 possibilities
Regards
Antoine.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/larry%40hastings.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to