On 2015年1月27日 00:07:08 +0100, Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2015年1月26日 16:28:24 -0500 > "R. David Murray" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > My use case is a configuration method that takes keyword parameters. > > In tests I want to specify a bunch of default values for the > > configuration, but I want individual test methods to be able > > to override those values. So I have a bunch of code that does > > the equivalent of: > > > > from test.support import default_config > > [...] > > def _prep(self, config_overrides): > > config = default.config.copy() > > config.update(config_overrides) > > my_config_object.load(**config) > > .... > > > > With the current proposal I could instead do: > > > > def _prep(self, config_overrides): > > my_config_object.load(**default_config, **config_overrides) > > It sounds like the _prep() method exists once in your code base, this > isn't an idiom you are duplicating everywhere. The incentive for a > syntactic shortcut looks pretty thin.
Something similar exists between five and ten times (I didn't go in and count) in my current code base, in various specific forms for different test classes. --David _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com