Ethan Furman <[email protected]> writes: > Well, this is the wrong mailing list for those questions.
Thanks. I addressed the claim here where it was made; but you're right that a different forum is better for an ongoing discussion about this topic. Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> writes: > My understanding is that the PSF needs the ability to relicense the > contribution under the standard PSF license, and it is the contributor > agreement that gives the PSF the legal right to do this. Okay, that's been raised before. If anyone can cite other specific dependencies that would necessitate a CLA for Python, please contact me off-list, and/or in the Python legal-sig <URL:https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-legal-sig>. > Many organizations, both for- and non-profit have this legal > requirement, and there are many avenues for satisfying these needs, > mostly based on different legal and business interpretations. And many do not. It would be good to shift the PSF into the larger set of organisations that do not require a CLA for accepting contributions. Thanks, all. Sorry to bring the topic up again here. -- \ "When I was born I was so surprised I couldn't talk for a year | `\ and a half." —Gracie Allen | _o__) | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com