24.01.14 17:07, Larry Hastings написав(ла):
a) Functions where there's a static Python value that behaves
identically to not passing in that parameter (aka "the NULL problem")
[...]
Possible Solutions:
0) Do nothing, don't convert the function.
1) Use that clever static value as the default.
I think #1 is reasonable solution. Internals of C function are just
implementation details.
b) Functions where there's no static Python value that behaves
identically to
not passing in that parameter (aka "the dynamic default problem")
There are functions with parameters whose defaults are mildly dynamic,
responding to other parameters.
Example:
I forget its name, but someone recently showed me a builtin that took
a list as its first parameter, and its optional second parameter
defaulted to the length of the list. As I recall this function didn't
allow negative numbers, so -1 wasn't a good fit.
Possible solutions:
0) Do nothing, don't convert the function.
1) Use a magic value as None. Preferably of the same type as the
function accepts, but failing that use None. If they pass in
the magic value use the previous default value. Guido himself
suggested this in
2) Use an Argument Clinic "optional group". This only works for
functions that don't support keyword arguments. Also, I hate
this, because "optional groups" are not expressable in Python
syntax, so these functions automatically have invalid signatures.
This is list.index(self, item, start=0, stop=len(self). Vajrasky Kok
works on this in issue20185 [1].
In this particular case we can use default stop=sys.maxsize, as in many
other places.
c) Functions that accept an 'int' when they mean 'boolean' (aka the
"ints instead of bools" problem)
[...]
I assert that Python has a crystal clear definition of what
constitutes "true" and "false". These parameters are clearly
intended as booleans but they don't conform to the boolean
protocol. So I suggest every instance of this is a (very mild!)
bug. But changing these parameters to use "p" is a change: they'll
accept many more values than before.
See issue15999 [2] which 16 months waits for review.
Solution:
1) Use "bool".
2) Use "int", and I'll go relax Argument Clinic so they
can use bool values as defaults for int parameters.
I use
int(c_default="0") = False
int(c_default="1") = True
See also rejected issue20282 [3].
d) Functions with behavior that deliberately defy being expressed as a
Python signature (aka the "untranslatable signature" problem)
Example:
itertools.repeat(), which behaves differently depending on whether
"times" is supplied as a positional or keyword argument. (If
"times" is <0, and was supplied via position, the function yields
0 times. If "times" is <0, and was supplied via keyword, the
function yields infinitely-many times.)
Solution:
0) Do nothing, don't convert the function.
1) Change the signature until it is Python compatible. This new
signature *must* accept a superset of the arguments accepted
by the existing signature. (This is being discussed right
now in issue #19145.)
In this particular case this is a bug and should be fixed irrespective
of Argument Clinic.
If we implemented this function in pure Python, we would have used the
sentinel idiom.
_forever = object()
def repeat(value, times=_forever):
if times is _forever:
...
else:
...
We need an equivalent to the sentinel idiom in Argument Clinic.
There is fifth category. The default value is C constant which is not
exposed to Python. For example in the zlib module:
zlib.decompress(data, [wbits, [bufsize]])
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com