Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 15 Jan 2014 08:00, "Greg Ewing" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> If so, would it help if asciistr were a built-in
> type, so that other things could be made aware of
> it?
That way lies the Python 2 text model, and we're not going there. It's
probably best to think of asciistr as a way of demonstrating a
rhetorical point about the superiority of the Python 3 text model
Hmmm... something like "The Python 3 text model is so
superior that we have to use this weird hack to write
something that makes perfectly good semantic sense
but is very awkward to write otherwise" ?-)
Anyhow, I've now convinced myself that asciistr as
a type is completely unnecessary -- see earlier post.
--
Greg
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com