Re: [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 3154 for 3.4?

2013年11月18日 07:51:18 -0800

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]>wrote:
> 18.11.13 07:53, Tim Peters написав(ла):
>
> - Some easy sanity checking due to the tiny redundancy (if the byte
>> immediately following the current frame is not a FRAME opcode, the
>> pickle is corrupt; and also corrupt if a FRAME opcode is encountered
>> _inside_ the current frame).
>>
>
> For efficient unpickling a FRAME opcode followed by 8-byte count should be
> *last* thing in a frame (unless it is a last frame).
>
I don't understand that.
Clearly the framing is the weakest point of the PEP (== elicits the most
bikeshedding). I am also unsure about the value of framing when pickles are
written to strings.
-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to